Coastal Cargo Company LLC v. Panobulk Logistics, Inc. et al
Coastal Cargo Company LLC |
Panobulk Logistics, Inc. and Cooper Consolidated, LLC |
2:2023cv06912 |
November 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Lance M Africk |
Eldon E Fallon |
Karen Wells Roby |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Property Damage |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER consolidating case with Master Case 2:23-cv-00027-EEF-KWR. Signed by Judge Eldon E. Fallon on 12/4/2023.(lag) |
Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Case transferred to Judge Eldon E. Fallon. Judge Lance M Africk no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 11/21/2023. (NEF: Section L)(ko) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Cooper Consolidated, LLC, Panobulk Logistics, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(ko) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cooper Consolidated, LLC, Panobulk Logistics, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-10277452) filed by Coastal Cargo Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Notice of related cases, #3 Summons Cooper Consolidated, #4 Summons Panobulk Logistics, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Peter Brooks Sloss added to party Coastal Cargo Company LLC(pty:pla).(Sloss, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.