Prewett Enterprises, Inc. v. Woodward Tishman
Plaintiff: Prewett Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a B&P Enterprises and Prewett Enterprises, Inc. doing business as B&P Enterprises
Defendant: Woodward-Tishman A Joint Venture, Woodward Tishman and Unidentified Parties
Case Number: 2:2023cv06954
Filed: November 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Janis van Meerveld
Referring Judge: Wendy B Vitter
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2023 Filing 9 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement/Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Prewett Enterprises, Inc. (Schrantz, Nathan) Modified text on 12/4/2023 (mmv).
December 1, 2023 Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed pursuant to Order, rec. doc. 8 against All Defendants filed by Prewett Enterprises, Inc. (Schrantz, Nathan) Modified text on 12/4/2023 (mmv).
November 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff, Prewett Enterprises, Inc., shall have ten (10) days from the date of this Order to file a disclosure statement pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(2)8 and to file a comprehensive amended complaint, without further leave of Court, properly setting forth the citizenship particulars of all of the parties, as required to establish that the Court has diversity jurisdiction over this case under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a). The comprehensive amended pleading shall include all of Plaintiff's numbered allegations, as revised, supplemented, and/or amended, which will become the operative complaint in this matter without reference to any other document in the record. Failure to comply with this Order may result in dismissal of the Complaint.. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 11/22/2023.(mmv)
November 22, 2023 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Woodward Tishman. (mmv)
November 22, 2023 Filing 5 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #4 Summons Submitted for Issuance. **1) The Summons should have been the main document- a copy of the complaint did not need to be provided as an attachment. **2) Attachment has duplicate description. For attachment, select either a category OR enter a description, selecting both will result in duplicate docket text. Clerk took corrective action. **3) Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of the Summons. The pdf should not have the pink header nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action. **4) The attorney did not completely fill in the Summons as directed. Attorney must provided their information in the space provided on the summons. Clerk took corrective action. No further action necessary.**(mmv)
November 22, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Submitted for Issuance (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Schrantz, Nathan) (Attachment 1 replaced on 11/22/2023) (mmv). Modified text on 11/22/2023 (mmv).
November 21, 2023 Filing 3 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. **Attachment has duplicate description. For attachment, select either a category OR enter a description, selecting both will result in duplicate docket text. Clerk took corrective action.** (mmv)
November 20, 2023 Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (mb)
November 20, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Woodward Tishman (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-10281571) filed by Prewett Enterprises, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A to Original Complaint, #3 Exhibit B to Original Complaint) Attorney Nathan Ladd Schrantz added to party Prewett Enterprises, Inc.(pty:pla).(Schrantz, Nathan) Modified text on 11/21/2023 (mmv).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Prewett Enterprises, Inc. v. Woodward Tishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Prewett Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a B&P Enterprises
Represented By: Nathan Ladd Schrantz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Prewett Enterprises, Inc. doing business as B&P Enterprises
Represented By: Nathan Ladd Schrantz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Woodward-Tishman A Joint Venture
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Woodward Tishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unidentified Parties
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?