Smith v. Hooper et al
Plaintiff: LaShawn Smith
Defendant: Timothy Hooper
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Case Number: 2:2024cv00068
Filed: January 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Carl J Barbier
Referring Judge: Karen Wells Roby
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Smith's #14 Request for Mandamus Relief is DENIED for seeking unnecessary and moot relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 2/29/2024.(pp)
February 27, 2024 Filing 14 Request for Mandamus Relief by LaShawn Smith. (amj)
February 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE the state court record submitted at ECF No. #11 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent's #12 Motion for Extension is GRANTED, and Respondent shall have an additional 21 days, through March 18, 2024, to file an answer, as stated herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Terrebonne Parish District Attorney as counsel for Respondent SHALL assure that the pdf image of the complete state court record to be filed on or before March 18, 2024, is in proper format as addressed in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 2/26/2024. (alm)
February 25, 2024 Filing 12 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Objections and to File State Court Record by Timothy Hooper. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. Attorney Joseph Sidney Soignet added to party Timothy Hooper(pty:dft).(Soignet, Joseph) Modified text on 2/26/2024 (pp).
February 25, 2024 Filing 11 **STRICKEN PER #13 ORDER** State Court Record - Habeas by Timothy Hooper, 1 volumes included. Note: This document will only be accessible to court users, case attorneys and the public terminals in the courthouse. (Soignet, Joseph) Modified text on 2/26/2024 (alm).
February 7, 2024 Filing 10 Return of Service of Habeas Corpus Response Order, doc. 7, served on Clerk, 32nd Judicial District on 2/2/24(gla)
February 7, 2024 Filing 9 Return of Service of Habeas Corpus Response Order, doc. 7, served on Attorney General's Office Criminal Division on 2/1/24(gla)
February 7, 2024 Filing 8 Return of Service of Habeas Corpus Response Order, doc. 7, served on Terrebonne Parish District Attorney's Office on 2/2/24(gla)
January 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Habeas Corpus Response Order that Attorney General for the State of Louisiana and the District Attorney for Terrebonne Parish respond to the petition of Habeas Corpus within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 1/26/2024.(pp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/26/2024: #1 Certified Mail-Terrebonne Parish Clerk, #2 Certified Mail- District Attorney, #3 Certified Mail-Terrebonne Parish District Attorney) (pp).
January 25, 2024 Filing fee paid from LaShawn Smith re #4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Filing fee $ 5.00-Receipt No. 200005332) (amj)
January 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DENYING #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 1/11/2024. (pp)
January 10, 2024 Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LaShawn Smith. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Original Deficient Filing)(amj) Images QC'd on 1/25/2024 (ss).
January 10, 2024 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by LaShawn Smith. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibits, #3 Exhibits, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(amj)
January 9, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) and #2 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 1/30/2024. (Attachments: #1 Deficient Filing) (aj) (Main Document 3 replaced on 1/9/2024) (aj).
January 8, 2024 Filing 2 ***DEFICIENT***EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by LaShawn Smith. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (aj)
January 8, 2024 Filing 1 ***DEFICIENT***PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by LaShawn Smith. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibits, #3 Exhibits, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(aj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Hooper et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LaShawn Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Hooper
Represented By: Joseph Sidney Soignet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?