Doe v. Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund
| John Doe |
| Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund, Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund doing business as Tulane University of Louisiana also known as Tulane University and Tulane University |
| 2:2024cv00098 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Darrel James Papillion |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Tracy L. Turner. Signed by Judge Darrel James Papillion on 03/01/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice) (ko)
|
| Filing 13 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-10417663) by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Shlosman, Thomas) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 MOTION to Seal Document as to rec. doc. 1. Signed by Judge Darrel James Papillion on 02/27/2024. (ko)
|
| Filing 11 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Seal Document by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit)(Shlosman, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 **DEFICIENT** EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-10416027) by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Shlosman, Thomas) Modified on 2/27/2024 (ko). |
| Filing 9 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #8 Waiver of Service Executed. Filing attorney entered incorrect date for the date waiver sent to party; waiver sent to Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund on 1/23/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. No further action is necessary. (cwa) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund on 1/23/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. (Shlosman, Thomas) Modified service/answer dates on 2/6/2024 (cwa). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER AND REASONS granting in part and denying in part #4 Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym. The motion is granted in part and denied in part as set forth herein. Signed by Judge Darrel James Papillion on 01/19/2024. (ko)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund. (ko) |
| Filing 5 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #3 Request for Summons Issued: Filing attorney did not properly format PDF of Summons. When the document was opened, the PDF was able to be edited. When using a form, print the document to PDF format prior to uploading. Clerk took corrective action by replacing image with one that cannot be edited (ko) |
| Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order)(Shlosman, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 Request of Summons Issued as to Administrators of Tulane Educational Fund filed by John Doe re #1 Complaint,. (Shlosman, Thomas) (Main Document 3 replaced on 1/11/2024) (ko). |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Darrel James Papillion and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (meb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against John Doe (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10355723) filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)Attorney Thomas W. Shlosman added to party John Doe(pty:pla).(Shlosman, Thomas) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/27/2024 per Order at Rec. Doc. 12: #3 SEALED Unredacted Complaint) (ko). Modified on 2/27/2024 (ko). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
