Roberts v. Rester et al
| Bryan Clayton Roberts |
| Justin Rester, Department of Public Safety and Corrections Louisiana State and Louisiana State |
| 2:2024cv00194 |
| January 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Lance M Africk |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER that a status conference will be held by telephone on 04/09/2024 at 9:30 a.m. Counsel shall comply as set forth herein. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 03/12/2024.(ko)
|
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/20/2024 09:00 AM before Judge Lance M Africk. Telephone Status Conference set for 4/9/2024 09:30 AM before Judge Lance M Africk. Jury Trial set for 9/23/2024 08:30 AM before Judge Lance M Africk. All discovery must be completed by 7/5/2024. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk. (Attachments: #1 Pretrial Notice Form)(gla)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE: Scheduling Conference set for 3/12/2024 09:30 AM before case manager by telephone. By Clerk. (blg) |
|
Filing 9
Order Vacating Case Referral to Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 02/16/2024.(ko)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF 636(c) NON CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The undersigned Magistrate Judge has been notified that all parties have not consented to proceed to trial before a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The matter is hereby returned to the docket of the District Judge for the scheduling of a preliminary conference and the selection of discovery cut-off, pre-trial conference, and trial dates. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 2/15/2024.(lb)(NEF Sec I) |
|
Filing 7
SHOW CAUSE ORDER: Considering that defendants have filed an Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint (Rec. Doc. #6 ), IT IS ORDERED that the Show Cause Order issued February 6, 2024, is deemed SATISFIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 2/14/2024. (alm)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, with Jury Demand by Louisiana State, Justin Rester.(Rouse, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Compliance by All Defendants re #1 Notice of Removal,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Rouse, Christopher) |
|
Filing 4
SHOW CAUSE ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff show good cause in writing by February 28, 2024, why the defendants should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal in accordance with Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 2/6/2024.(lb)
|
| Filing 3 Directive of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Justin Rester, Louisiana State. By Clerk.(ko) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (meb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 22nd District Court for the Parish of Washington, case number 118867 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10368690) filed by Louisiana State, Justin Rester. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Christopher J. Rouse added to party Department of Public Safety and Corrections Louisiana State(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher J. Rouse added to party Justin Rester(pty:dft).(Rouse, Christopher) Modified on 1/23/2024 (ko). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
