Jones v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
| Robert E. Jones, III |
| State Farm Fire & Casualty Company |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2024cv00258 |
| January 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Jay C Zainey |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS Fourth Amendment to Ida CMO No. 1. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 12/12/2023.(mmm) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jay C. Zainey and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (meb) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by State Farm Fire & Casualty Company identifying Corporate Parent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company for State Farm Fire & Casualty Company (Dorsey, Dan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand from Civil District Court, case number CDC (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10379264) filed by State Farm Fire & Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Notice of Compliance/Certificate of Entire Suit Record, #4 Certificate of Filing, #5 Exhibit A, #6 Exhibit B) Attorney Dan Richard Dorsey added to party State Farm Fire & Casualty Company(pty:dft).(Dorsey, Dan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
