Bua v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
Jodie Bua |
Scottsdale Insurance Company |
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
2:2024cv00355 |
February 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Lance M Africk |
Karen Wells Roby |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Notice of Compliance Response to Court's 28 U.S.C. 1447(b) Directive by Scottsdale Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal,,. (Hanna, Mark) |
Filing 4 HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS Fourth Amendment to Ida CMO No. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 12/12/2023.(lb) |
Filing 3 DIRECTIVE of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company.(lb) (lb). |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (meb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 24th Judicial District Court, Jefferson Parish, case number 849-885 "F" (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10396375) filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Notice of Appearance and Request for Notice, #5 Verification, #6 Certificate of Filing Notice of Removal, #7 State Court Notice of Removal, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Mark Emerson Hanna added to party Scottsdale Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Hanna, Mark) Modified text on 2/9/2024 (lb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.