Huesman v. Lopinto et al
Ms. JULIE STEWART HUESMAN and Julie Stewart Huesman |
Sheriff Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Joseph P. Lopinto, III, Michelle Ruffin and Unidentified Parties |
Deputy MICHELLE RUFFIN |
2:2024cv00375 |
February 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Carl J Barbier |
Karen Wells Roby |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. IT IS ORDERED that Sheriff Joseph P. Lopinto, III, shall have an additional twenty (20) days through April 22, 2024, to file responsive pleadings to the Complaint filed herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 4/2/2024. (pp) |
Filing 3 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint by Joseph P. Lopinto, III. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Daniel Rault Martiny added to party Joseph P. Lopinto, III(pty:dft).(Martiny, Daniel) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl J Barbier and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (kls) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lopinto, Ruffin (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10398396) filed by Huesman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) Attorney Dominic N. Varrecchio added to party JULIE STEWART HUESMAN (pty:pla).(Varrecchio, Dominic) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.