Armond v. Social Security Administration
Jeanne M. Armond |
Social Security Administration |
U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA |
2:2024cv00385 |
February 14, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Eldon E Fallon |
Michael North |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to David F. Chermol. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 2/15/2024. (Attachments: #1 PHV Notice) (cs) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Eldon E. Fallon and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (kls) |
Filing 2 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice David F. Chermol (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-10399834) by Jeanne M. Armond. Motion(s) referred to Michael North (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Consent to Electronic Filing, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Proposed Order)(Bourgeois, Loyd) Modified on 2/14/2024 (my). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10399831) filed by Jeanne M. Armond. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Loyd J. Bourgeois, Jr added to party Jeanne M. Armond(pty:pla).(Bourgeois, Loyd) Modified on 2/14/2024 (my). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.