Hihar v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
| Nancy Hihar |
| State Farm Fire and Casualty Company |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2024cv00406 |
| February 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Michael North |
| Sarah S Vance |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS Fourth Amendment to Ida CMO No. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 12/12/2023.(cs) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Sarah S Vance and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (kls) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Diversity Jurisdiction Statement. (Ammons, Todd) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (Ammons, Todd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand from 24th Judicial District, case number 844884 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10403585) filed by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit-State Court Pleadings, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)Attorney Todd M. Ammons added to party State Farm Fire and Casualty Company(pty:dft).(Ammons, Todd) Modified text on 2/16/2024 (cs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
