Mohare et al v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Pradnesh Mohare and Kuntal Mohare |
Amica Mutual Insurance Company |
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
2:2024cv00436 |
February 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Lance M Africk |
Eva J Dossier |
Karen Wells Roby |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Case transferred to Magistrate Judge Eva J. Dossier. Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 04/12/2024.(lag) |
Filing 3 HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS Fourth Amendment to Ida CMO No. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 12/12/2023.(lb) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 24th JDC, case number 845-989 "I" (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10409033) filed by Amica Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice to Adverse Party, #3 Notice of Compliance, #4 State Court Pleadings, #5 Exhibit B-Initial Disclosures, #6 Exhibit C-Estimate)Attorney John Powers Wolff, III added to party Amica Mutual Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Wolff, John) Modified text on 2/22/2024 (lb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.