Wolfe v. Patch et al
| Scott Wolfe, Jr. |
| Tobias Patch and Brelly, Inc. |
| 2:2024cv00479 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims raised in the above captioned matter are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on March 29, 2024.(mp)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Brelly, Inc. and Tobias Patch by Scott Wolfe, Jr. (Anada, Tarak) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants are granted an additional twenty-one days to file responsive pleadings to the complaint filed by Plaintiff. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on March 20, 2024. (mp)
|
| Filing 15 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by Tobias Patch, Brelly, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order)Attorney Robert E. Couhig, III added to party Tobias Patch(pty:dft).(Couhig, Robert) Modified filers on 3/20/2024 (mp). |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Brelly, Inc. served on 2/28/2024, answer due 3/18/2024 (Anada, Tarak) Modified text on 3/8/2024 (mp). |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Brelly, Inc. served on 2/28/2024, answer due 3/18/2024 (Anada, Tarak) Modified on 3/8/2024 (mp). |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Tobias Patch served on 3/2/2024, answer due 3/2/2024 (Anada, Tarak) Modified text on 3/8/2024 (mp). |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Brelly, Inc. served on 2/28/2024, answer due 3/20/2024 (Anada, Tarak) Modified text on 3/8/2024 (mp). |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Brelly, Inc. served on 2/28/2024, answer due 3/18/2024 (Anada, Tarak) Modified text on 3/8/2024 (mp). |
| Filing 9 *FILED IN ERROR - See Rec. Doc. 12*: SUMMONS Returned Executed; Tobias Patch served on 3/2/2024, answer due 3/25/2024. (Anada, Tarak) Modified on 3/8/2024 (mp). |
| Filing 8 *FILED IN ERROR - See Rec. Doc. 11*: SUMMONS Returned Executed; Brelly, Inc. served on 2/28/2024, answer due 3/20/2024. (Anada, Tarak) Modified on 3/8/2024 (mp). |
| Filing 7 *FILED IN ERR0R - See Rec. Doc. 10*: SUMMONS Returned Executed; Brelly, Inc. served on 2/26/2024, answer due 3/18/2024. (Anada, Tarak) Modified on 3/8/2024 (mp). |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Brelly, Inc., and Tobias Patch. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(gla) |
| Filing 5 Request of Summons Issued as to Tobias Patch filed by Scott Wolfe, Jr re #1 Complaint,. (Anada, Tarak) |
| Filing 4 Request of Summons Issued as to Brelly, Inc. filed by Scott Wolfe, Jr re #1 Complaint,. (Anada, Tarak) |
| Filing 3 Request of Summons Issued as to Brelly, Inc. filed by Scott Wolfe, Jr re #1 Complaint,. (Anada, Tarak) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (kls) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10414129) filed by Scott Wolfe, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10)Attorney Tarak Anada added to party Scott Wolfe, Jr(pty:pla).(Anada, Tarak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
