United Plastic Molders, Inc. v. House of Outdoors, Inc. et al
| United Plastic Molders, Inc. |
| House of Outdoors, Inc. and Mystery Tackle Box, Inc. |
| 2:2024cv00629 |
| March 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Carl J Barbier |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl J Barbier and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (meb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10440788) filed by United Plastic Molders, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons for House of Outdoors, Inc., #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 8, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 9, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 10, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 11, #14 Exhibit Exhibit 12, #15 Exhibit Exhibit 13, #16 Exhibit Exhibit 14, #17 Exhibit Exhibit 15, #18 Exhibit Exhibit 16, #19 Exhibit Exhibit 17, #20 Exhibit Exhibit 18, #21 Summons Summons for Mystery Tackle Box, Inc.)Attorney Jared Klar Rovira added to party United Plastic Molders, Inc.(pty:pla).(Rovira, Jared) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
