Lennix et al v. American Security Insurance Company
Pamela Lennix and Juan Lennix |
American Security Insurance Company |
2:2024cv00802 |
March 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Lance M Africk |
Karen Wells Roby |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (meb) |
Filing 3 Notice of Compliance by American Security Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Answer)(Burtchaell, Roy) |
Filing 2 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by American Security Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Assurant, Inc. for American Security Insurance Company (Burtchaell, Roy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 40th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. John, case number 80253 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10463748) filed by American Security Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Pleadings Exhibit A - Petition as Served, #2 Exhibit B - Policy, #3 Exhibit C - Payment Letter, #4 Exhibit D - Plaintiff's Estimate, #5 Exhibit E - Plaintiff's HVAC Estimate, #6 Exhibit F - Plaintiff's Disclosures, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Roy A. Burtchaell added to party American Security Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Burtchaell, Roy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.