Coppock et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
Plaintiff: Ernest Coppock and Dimetrius White
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and Illinois Central Railroad Company
Case Number: 2:2024cv00944
Filed: April 16, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Greg Gerard Guidry
Referring Judge: Janis van Meerveld
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2024 Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Attorney Robert Harrison Golden added to party Norfolk Southern Railway Company(pty:dft). (Golden, Robert) Modified on 5/28/2024 (gla).
April 17, 2024 Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint, - Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of Summons. The pdf should not have the purple boxes nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action. (gla)
April 17, 2024 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Illinois Central Railroad Company, Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(gla)
April 16, 2024 Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Greg Gerard Guidry and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (cc)
April 16, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Credit Card not accepted or unavailable - payment of filing fee due within 2 business days) filed by Ernest Coppock. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons to Norfolk Southern Railway Company, #3 Summons to Illinois Central Railroad Company)Attorney Booth G Samuels added to party Ernest Coppock(pty:pla).(Samuels, Booth) Modified on 4/17/2024 (gla). (Attachment 2 replaced on 4/17/2024) (gla). (Attachment 3 replaced on 4/17/2024) (gla).
April 16, 2024 Filing fee received James H Wettermark : $ 405.00 Receipt No 6557 (ess)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coppock et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ernest Coppock
Represented By: Booth G Samuels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dimetrius White
Represented By: Booth G Samuels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Represented By: Patrick A. Talley, Jr.
Represented By: Keiran S McCluskie
Represented By: Robert Harrison Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Illinois Central Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?