Stoufflet v. Great West Casualty Company, et al
| Keith Stoufflet |
| Great West Casualty Insurance Company, J. Patrick Lee Construction, LLC and Christopher Carroll |
| 2:2024cv01051 |
| April 25, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Wendy B Vitter |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (meb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand from Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, case number 202400155 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10502718) filed by Great West Casualty Insurance Company, Christopher Carroll, J. Patrick Lee Construction, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit Verification of Notice of Removal, #3 State Court Pleadings Ex. 1 - State Court Record, #4 Exhibit Ex. 2 - Plaintiff's Discovery Responses, #5 Exhibit Ex. 3 - Excerpts of Plaintiff's Medical Records)Attorney Michael Cody Wynne added to party Christopher Carroll(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Cody Wynne added to party Great West Casualty Insurance Company(pty:dft), Attorney Michael Cody Wynne added to party J. Patrick Lee Construction, LLC(pty:dft).(Wynne, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
