Munster et al v. Blue Hill Specialty Insurance Company et al
Laurie Munster |
Blue Hill Specialty Insurance Company and Devante Scott |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
2:2024cv01596 |
June 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Brandon S Long |
Karen Wells Roby |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Brandon S. Long and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (car) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Blue Hill Specialty Insurance Company Diversity Disclosure Statement. (Royce, Doris) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Blue Hill Specialty Insurance Company List of Parties & Counsel. (Royce, Doris) |
Filing 2 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Blue Hill Specialty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Progressive Commercial Holdings, LLC for Blue Hill Specialty Insurance Company (Royce, Doris) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand from Civil District Court, case number 2024-1913 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ALAEDC-10579233) filed by Blue Hill Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 State Court Pleadings, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Doris A. Royce added to party Blue Hill Specialty Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Royce, Doris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.