Clark v. State of Louisiana, et al
| Jeffery C Clark |
| All Defendants, Angola State Penitentiary, Billy Bagget, David Bonnett, Darren Bordelon, Burl Cain, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Douglas Durrett, Michael Garner, Jimmy Johnson, LSP Swat Team, Joseph Lamartinire, Paul Perkins, David Ross, State of Louisiana, Unknown Defendants and Ronald Welch |
| Billy Bagget, David Bonnett, Darren Bordelon, John Doe, Douglas Durrett, Michael Garner, Jimmy Johnson, Joseph Lamartinire, Paul Perkins, John Roe, David Ross, Richard L. Stalder and Ronald Welch |
| 3:2000cv00956 |
| December 28, 2000 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Docia L Dalby |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
174
ORDER denying 173 Motion to Quash with leave to refile in the Court where compliance is required. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. on 12/21/2015. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
148
ORDER denying 133 MOTION to Compel Entry Upon Land and 146 MOTION to Stay Motion to Compel Entry Upon Land filed by Jeffery C Clark.A Telephone Status Conference set for 8/7/2015 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois Jr.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 8/3/2015. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER: Plaintiffs 100 Motion to Compel Discovery be and it is hereby DENIED IN PART, such that the defendants shall not be compelled to produce the documentation requested in the plaintiffs Requests for Production Nos. 3(a) and (b) and 4(a) and (b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 11/3/2014. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER granting in part 100 Motion to Compel Discovery such that within 30 days of the date of this Order, the defendants shall more fully respond to the plaintiffs Requests for Production Nos. 2(a), 8, 12 and 19 as outlined above. Within 30 days o f the date of this Order, the defendants shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the alleged potential threat to security presented by the production of documentation requested in the plaintiffs Requests for Production Nos. 3(a) and (b) and 4(a) and (b). The plaintiffs request for costs and attorneys fees associated with the instant Motion be and it is hereby DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr on 8/8/2014. (SMG)
|
|
Filing
65
RULING on REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The court approves and adopts the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge. The motion 38 to consolidate is hereby DENIED.. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 09/27/2012. (CGP)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting in part 30 Motion to Unseal Discovery Documents, such that five (5) days after the entry of this Order, the Clerk of Court shall make the pleadings and attachments filed under seal in Civil Action No. 00-0957-RET-DLD, at rec.doc.no. 25, available to plaintiff Jeffery C. Clark, through his attorney, and shall otherwise retain these pleadings and attachments under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Docia L Dalby on 9/10/2012. (JDL)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 19 Motion to Lift Stay and to sever his individual claims from this consolidated litigation, be and it is hereby granted, and that Civil Action No. 00-0956-JJB-DLD be reinstated on the Docket of the Court.. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 12/5/2011. (CMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
