Morehouse v. Jackson et al

Case Number: 3:2006cv00775
Filed: October 6, 2006
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Referring Judge: Stephen C. Riedlinger
Presiding Judge: Ralph E. Tyson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 27, 2013 70 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM RULING granting 32 First MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by David L Duplantier, John Mclure, G Lee Griffin, Burl Cain, Rosa B Jackson, James A Smith, Edward R Jackson, Roxie F. Goynes-Clark, Chatman H Reed, 52 Supplemental MOTI ON to DismissSupplemental MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by David L Duplantier, John Mclure, G Lee Griffin, Burl Cain, Rosa B Jackson, James A Smith, Edward R Jackson, Roxie F. Goynes-Clark, Chatman H Reed. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E. Foote on 03/26/2013. (Williams, Lysandra)
March 10, 2010 51 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: The defts shall have until 3/31/2010 to file a supplemental memorandum in support of their pending 32 MOTION to Dismiss/MOTION for Summary Judgment. Pltf shall file any response within the time allowed by the local rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 3/10/2010. (JDL, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morehouse v. Jackson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?