Morehouse v. Jackson et al
| 3:2006cv00775 |
| October 6, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Ralph E. Tyson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
MEMORANDUM RULING granting 32 First MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by David L Duplantier, John Mclure, G Lee Griffin, Burl Cain, Rosa B Jackson, James A Smith, Edward R Jackson, Roxie F. Goynes-Clark, Chatman H Reed, 52 Supplemental MOTI ON to DismissSupplemental MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by David L Duplantier, John Mclure, G Lee Griffin, Burl Cain, Rosa B Jackson, James A Smith, Edward R Jackson, Roxie F. Goynes-Clark, Chatman H Reed. Signed by Judge Elizabeth E. Foote on 03/26/2013. (Williams, Lysandra)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER: The defts shall have until 3/31/2010 to file a supplemental memorandum in support of their pending 32 MOTION to Dismiss/MOTION for Summary Judgment. Pltf shall file any response within the time allowed by the local rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 3/10/2010. (JDL, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Morehouse v. Jackson et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
