Andrade et al v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Company, Inc.
| 3:2006cv00907 |
| November 29, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Christine Noland |
| Frank J. Polozola |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 0688 Jones Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
RULING & ORDER: 90 Motion for Contempt Sanctions and/or to Compel Dr. David Greeson to Respond to the Subpoena Duces Tecum and Order is GRANTED as set forth in the ruling. FURTHER ORDERED that DR. David Greeson shall produce the records to deft wi thin 15 days of this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that if Dr. Greeson fails to produce records to deft, he shall pay monetary sanctions, as described, and he will be forbidden from testifying in this lawsuit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 12/15/2009. (JDL, )
|
|
Filing
87
RULING: Pltfs 69 Motion in Limine is GRANTED insofar as the motion seeks exclusion at trial of evidence pertaining to unrelated accidents, injuries, illnesses, and/or claims arising from those unrelated accidents, injuries and illnesses, and DENIED otherwise. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 9/21/2009. (JDL, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Andrade et al v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
