Doolittle v. Holmes et al
| 3:2006cv00986 |
| December 29, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Christine Noland |
| Ralph E. Tyson |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
JUDGMENT: The defts motions for summary judgment 69 is granted, dismissing the pltfs claim asserted against the remaining defts, and this action is dismissed. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 1/4/2010. (JDL, )
|
|
Filing
75
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 72 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by John Doolittle and 69 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Jolie Darbonne, Howard Prince...It is recommended that the pltfs motion for summary judgment be denied, that t he defts motion for summary judgment be granted, dismissing the pltfs claim asserted against the remaining defts, and that this action be dismissed... Objections to R&R due by 10/30/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 10/16/2009. (JDL, )
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying as premature 65 Pltfs Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 4/21/2009. (JDL, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doolittle v. Holmes et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
