Heck et al v. Buhler et al
Raymond E. Heck, Doug Hamley, Charles Moore, Joseph Mckearn and Allen Richardson |
Kenneth K. Buhler, Wayne Triche and Daryl S Dearmond |
Wayne Triche |
Kenneth K. Buhler |
3:2007cv00021 |
January 10, 2007 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
East Baton Rouge |
Christine Noland |
Ralph E. Tyson |
Securities/Commodities |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 261 Factual Finding Made Pursuant to the Ruling and Order. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 12/23/2015. (BCL) |
Filing 254 ORDER granting 253 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Court's 11/20/2015 252 Order to Supplement. The deadline is extended to 12/21/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 12/4/2015. (LLH) |
Filing 251 RULING and ORDER: Defendant's Local Rule 72a Motion to Review 241 Magistrate Judge's Order Or, Alternatively, Objection to Ruling on Motion to Compel and For Contempt is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Magi strate Judge make a factual finding as to whether Defendant has offered to pay the full amount he properly owes, including interest, in light of this ruling, the 2/4/2014,judgment, (Doc. 210), and the 5/15/2015, ruling on attorneys' fees, (Doc. 228). Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 11/20/2015. (JDL) |
Filing 241 RULING granting in part and denying in part 238 Motion for Contempt and 239 Motion to Compel. Defendant Wayne Triche shall provide responses to theplaintiffs' interrogatories and request for production of documents within 14 days. No object ions will be allowed. Because the defendants actions were substantially justified, no costs are due under Rule 37(a)(5)(A). Plaintiff's motion is denied insofar as the plaintiff sought an order finding the defendant in contempt. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 9/28/2015. (BCL) |
Filing 228 RULING AND ORDER granting 212 Request for Attorney Fees ( Response to Court's 2/4/2014 RULING(hereinafter, "Motion")). Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 5/14/2014. (LLH) |
Filing 210 RULING, ORDER AND JUDGMENT granting in part and denying in part 205 Motion for Reconsideration of 200 Ruling and Order dated 7/2/2013. Any future motion, limited to the issue of their attorney's reasonable rate(s) shall be filed no l ater than 2/18/2014. If Plaintiff's refile their requests for fees, Defendants shall have until 3/11/2014 to file a response. Judgment shall be entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against defendants as stated herein. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 2/4/2014. (LLH) |
Filing 200 RULING AND ORDER denying without prejudice 198 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying as moot 199 Motion for Leave to file an Opposition; granting in part and denying in part 173 Motion to Alter Judgment. Plaintiffs shall file a motion and proposed order within 14 days of this Ruling specifying the amounts owed by each defendant to each plaintiff, including interest. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 07/01/2013. (CGP) |
Filing 197 RULING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND/OR TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT, AND MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW. For reasons stated hereing, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant's Motion forJudgment as a Matter of Law 181 . The Court further DENIES Defendant's Motion forNew Trial And/Or to Alter or Amend the Judgment 185 . Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 9/28/2012. (PJH) |
Filing 114 RULING Adopting 112 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. 99 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Wayne Triche is GRANTED IN PART, in that plaintiffs Section 29(b) rescission claim and breach of contract claim against Triche are dismissed with prejudice and DENIED IN PART in that plaintiffs claims against Triche pursuant to §10b and Rule 10b-5 and pursuant to La. R.S. 51:712A(2) are not dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge Ralph E. Tyson on 3/29/10. (BP, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.