Wells v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
| Kelvin Wells |
| Commissioner of Social Security and The Social Security Administration |
| 3:2007cv00889 |
| November 21, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| East Baton Rouge |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Ralph E. Tyson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
RULING Adopting 21 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the claim of Kelvin Wells, for disability and supplemental security income (SSI) benefits will be affirmed, and this action will be dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge Ralph E. Tyson on 8/10/09. (BP, )
|
|
Filing
21
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 1 Complaint filed by Kelvin Wells. It is the recommendation of the magistrate judge that under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the claim of Kelvin Wells, for disability and supplemental security income (SSI) benefits be affirmed, and this action be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 7/2/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 6/18/09. (BP, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
