G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Zachary Printing & Office Supply, Inc.
| G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc. |
| Zachary Printing & Office Supply, Inc. |
| 3:2007cv00925 |
| December 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| East Baton Rouge |
| Christine Noland |
| John V. Parker |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc. v. Zachary Printing & Office Supply, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: G.E. Capital Information Technology Solutions, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Eric J. Derbes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Zachary Printing & Office Supply, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
