Scott v. Hubert et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 27, 2013
RULING Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge, and ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The petitioner's claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel during his sexual battery trial, when his trial attorney failed to timely make a Batson challenge during jury selection, is denied and this action ishereby dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 3/27/2013. (PJH)
|July 23, 2012
OPINION Adopting 49 Report and Recommendations that petitioner's claim that his guilty plea to aggravated burglary was not knowing and voluntary is denied.This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings on petitioner's sexual battery trial ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 07/23/2012. (KDC)
|May 14, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Warren Scott, III...It is recommended that the petitioners application for habeas corpus relief challenging his convictions for unauthorized entry of an inhabited dw elling and aggravated burglary be dismissed, with prejudice, as untimely pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). It is further recommended that the petitioners application for habeas corpus relief challenging his sexual battery conviction be dismissed, with prejudice, as procedurally barred... Objections to R&R due by 5/29/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 5/14/2009. (NLT, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?