Smith v. Hebert et al
| Theodore Smith |
| Gabriel Hebert, Kevin Benjamin, M Laborde, C Darbonne, Louis Stood, Rachel Taylor, Bo Whitaker, Chad Hukins, Todd Barrere, David Voorhies, Jr., Burl Cain and Richard Stalder |
| 3:2008cv00030 |
| January 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Ascension |
| Docia L Dalby |
| Ralph E. Tyson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
263
RULING: The 262 motion by pltf to file a supplemental objection is GRANTED. The Court approves the 231 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein, and the 208 motion by pltf for summary judgment, is DENIED, and the 191 motion by defts for summary judgment is GRANTED, and this matter shall be dismissed. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 1/23/2012. (JDL)
|
|
Filing
233
RULING Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants is granted and plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is denied and this action shall be dismissed.. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 9/30/11. (PJH)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER denying as moot 94 Pltfs Motion to Compel Defts to File an Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Docia L Dalby on 5/19/2009. (JDL, )
|
|
Filing
95
RULING Adopting 91 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 42 motion to dismiss is granted in part, dismissing all of the plaintiff's claims except the plaintiff's equal protection claim against Kevin Benjamin and h is retaliation claims against Michael Laborde, Rachel Taylor, Todd Barrere, David Voorhies, Harold Sterling, James Tillman, Louis Stroud and Irving Stammriech. The court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's state law and this action is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Ralph E. Tyson on 4/24/2009. (NLT, )
|
|
Filing
91
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 42 MOTION to Dismiss by defendants... It is recommended that the 42 motion to dismiss be granted in part, dismissing all of the plaintiff's claims except the plaintiff's equal protection claim agains t Kevin Benjamin and his retaliation claims against Michael Laborde, Rachel Taylor, Todd Barrere, David Voorhies, Harold Sterling, James Tillman, Louis Stroud and Irving Stammriech. It is further recommended that the court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's state law and this action be referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings... Objections to R&R due by 3/30/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Docia L Dalby on 3/13/2009. (NLT, )
|
|
Filing
79
RULING Adopting 57 Report and Recommendations of the US Magistrate Judge, The defendant's 41 motion for summary judgment is granted, dismissing the plaintiff's claims that he was subjected to an excessive use of force and that excessive force was applied in retaliation for filing an administrative grievance, for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies pursuant to 42 USC 1997e(a), and with prejudice to refiling them in forma paupers status. Further, this matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Ralph E. Tyson on 1/7/2009. (NLT, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
