Romero v. Energy Resource Technology GOM Inc
Plaintiff: Nicholas Romero
Defendant: Energy Resource Technology GOM Inc
Case Number: 3:2008cv00418
Filed: July 9, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana
Office: P.I.: Other Office
County: East Baton Rouge
Presiding Judge: Christine Noland
Presiding Judge: John V. Parker
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RULING & ORDER granting 6 Motion to Compel as stated herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 1/26/09. (BP, ) Modified on 1/26/2009 to edit text (BP, ).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Romero v. Energy Resource Technology GOM Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Romero
Represented By: David C. Whitmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Energy Resource Technology GOM Inc
Represented By: Bryan David Scofield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?