Bolden v. Young et al
Clarence Bolden |
Roger Young, Unknown Gun Guards and Burl Cain |
3:2008cv00560 |
September 8, 2008 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
West Feliciana |
Christine Noland |
John V. Parker |
None |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 RULING Adopting 16 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Defts 10 Motion for Partial Dismissal is GRANTED, dismissing pltfs claims against defts Roger Young and Burl Cain in their official capacities, with prejudice, and dismissing the pltfs claims asserted against deft Burl Cain, with prejudice, on the basis of qualified immunity, and this matter is referred back to MJ Noland for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Ralph E. Tyson on 6/10/2009. (JDL, ) |
Filing 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 10 MOTION for Partial Dismissal filed by Roger Young, Burl Cain. It is recommended that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss, rec.doc.no. 10, be granted, dismissing the plaintiff's claims against defendan t Roger Young and Burl Cain in their official capacities, with prejudice, and dismissing the plaintiff's claims asserted against defendant Burl Cain, with prejudice, on the basis of qualified immunity,and that this matter be referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 5/11/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 4/27/09. (BP, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.