Johnson v. Cain et al
| Walter Johnson |
| N. Burl Cain, Joe Lamartiniere, Tim Delaney, Preseley Bordenlon, Larry Douglas and Angola Boxing Assoc. |
| 3:2008cv00590 |
| September 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| West Feliciana |
| Docia L Dalby |
| Frank J. Polozola |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
OPINION Adopting 65 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge and 60 , 63 pltfs motions for summary judgment shall be DENIED, defts 59 motion for summary judgment shall be GRANTED and this action shall be DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 2/9/2011. (JDL)
|
|
Filing
45
OPINION Adopting 41 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. 33 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Walter E. Johnson, Jr. shall be denied and this action shall be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 1/12/10. (BP, )
|
|
Filing
41
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Walter E. Johnson, Jr. It is recommended that the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied, and that this action be referred back for further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 1/4/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Docia L Dalby on 12/16/09. (BP, )
|
|
Filing
37
OPINION Adopting 35 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pla's claims asserted against dfts Tim Delaney and the Angola Boxing Association shall be dismissed for failure to serve these dfts within 120 days as mandated by FR CP Rule 4(m). Further ordered that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over all state law claims and that the Motion to Dismiss of the remaining dfts shall be granted in part, dismissing the pla's claims asserted against dft Burl Cain and dismissing the pla's claim that dfts Joe Lamartiniere and Preseley Bordenlon were deliberately indifferent to pla's safety and well-being by failing to control or segregate a co-inmate who they knew posed an unreasonable dang er to the physical safety of other prisoners. Further ordered that the state law claims shall be dismissed without prejudice. Further ordered that this action be referred back for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 9/30/09. (BP, )
|
|
Filing
35
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 12 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Joe Lamartiniere, N. Burl Cain, Larry Douglas, Preseley Bordenlon...It is recommended that the pltfs claims asserted against defts Tim Delaney and the Angola Boxing Association be d ismissed for failure to serve these defts within 120 days as mandated by FRCP Rule 4(m). It is further recommended that Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and that the Motion to Dismiss of the remaining defts be granted in part, dis missing the pltfs claims asserted against deft Burl Cain and dismissing the pltfs claim that defts Joe Lamartiniere and Preseley Bordenlon were deliberately indifferent to pltfs safety and well-being by failing to control or segregate a co-inmate who they knew posed an unreasonable danger to the physical safety of other prisoners, and that this action be referred back for further proceedings... Objections to R&R due by 9/18/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Docia L Dalby on 9/3/2009. (JDL, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
