Williams v. Hinyard et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 3, 2011
RULING granting in part and denying in part 68 Motion to Compel. Within 14 days the defendants shall serve a supplemental response to requests for production of documents numbers 3, 4, 9 and 10. In all other respects, the plaintiffs motion is denied, the parties shall bear their respective costs incurred in connection with this motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 10/3/2011. (LSM)
|May 1, 2009
RULING Adopting 23 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. 17 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Juan Conrad, Eric Hinyard, Willie Dickens is granted and this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B) (ii). Further, the claims against deft Sgt. Kevin Smith are dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCP 4(m). Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 5/1/09. (BP, ) Modified on 5/1/2009 to edit text (BP, ).
|April 13, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Juan Conrad, Eric Hinyard, Willie Dickens...It is recommended that the motion for summary judgment be granted and this action be dismissed pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). It is further recommended that the claims against deft Sgt. Kevin Smith be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCP 4(m)... Objections to R&R due by 4/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 4/13/2009. (JDL, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?