Hodge v. East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office et al
| Donald C Hodge |
| East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office and Louisiana State University Board of Supervisors |
| 3:2008cv00735 |
| November 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| East Baton Rouge |
| Ralph E. Tyson |
| Christine Noland |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
JUDGMENT in favor of East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Office, The Board of Supervisors for Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Greg Phares, Leonardo Deon Moore against Donald C. Hodge, Jr. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 1/5/10. (BP, )
|
|
Filing
13
RULING denying 11 Motion for Rule 54(b) Certification. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 5/19/2009. (JDL, )
|
|
Filing
10
RULING granting 5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by The Board of Supervisors for Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College and the 3 Notice of Exception of Lack of Procedural Capacity and No Cause of Action filed by East Baton R ouge Parish Sheriff's Office. The Board's request for attorney's fees is DENIED at this time for lack of adequate factual and legal foundation. Pltf may amend his complaint by 5/31/2009 to state a cognizable claim against Lt. Moore and/or the Sheriff of EBRP. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 3/24/2009. (JDL, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
