Battley, Sr. et al v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.
Landry Battley, Sr. and Wanda E. Battley |
Harcros Chemicals, Inc. |
3:2009cv00008 |
January 7, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
P.I.: Other Office |
East Baton Rouge |
Christine Noland |
Frank J. Polozola |
Defendant |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 OPINION Adopting 15 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. 5 Motion to Remand, shall be GRANTED and this matter shall be REMANDED to the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Iberville, State of Louisiana, for further proceedings. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs request for an award of the attorneys fees and costs that they incurred in bringing this motion shall be DENIED. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 4/29/09. (BP, ) |
Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 5 MOTION to Remand filed by Wanda E. Battley, Landry Battley, Sr. It is recommended that the Motion to Remand (R. Doc. 5) should be GRANTED and that this matter should be REMANDED to the 18th Judicial District C ourt, Parish of Iberville, State of Louisiana, for further proceedings. It is further recommended that plaintiffs' request for an award of the attorneys' fees and costs that they incurred in bringing this motion should be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 3/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 3/12/09. (BP, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.