White v. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff: Walter Darren White
Defendant: Michael Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2009cv00016
Filed: January 16, 2009
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County: East Baton Rouge
Presiding Judge: Ralph E. Tyson
Referring Judge: Christine Noland
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:416 Denial of Social Security Benefits

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 10, 2009 16 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security and against Walter Darren White, dismissing pltf's suit with prejudice, at pltf's cost. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 12/10/2009. (JDL, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White v. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Walter Darren White
Represented By: Judy Stewart Franklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?