Anderson v. State of Louisiana, et al
| Shawn Anderson |
| State of Louisiana, James M. LeBlanc, Burl Cain, Richard L. Peabody and Yusuf Abdullah |
| 3:2009cv00075 |
| February 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| West Feliciana |
| James J. Brady |
| Docia L Dalby |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
RULING and Order granting in part and denying in part 26 MOTION to Modify Scheduling Order and to Amend the Complaint.. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 7/8/2010. (CMM,)
|
|
Filing
45
RULING Adopting 42 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. 26 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order and to Amend the Complaint is granted in part, such that the Complaint be amended to assert the claim stated in paragraphs 36 through 40 of the proposed Amended Complaint regarding an alleged state-wide policy with response to the Nation of Islam, and denied in all other respects. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 6/18/10. (BP, )
|
|
Filing
17
RULING : The court DISMISSES plaintiff's § 1983 claim against the State of Louisiana through the DPSC. In all other respects, the court DENIES the defendants' 13 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 4/23/09. (BP, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
