Lewis v. Cain et al
| Sugar Ray Lewis |
| Burl Cain, Carlos Pennywell and Clarence Harris |
| 3:2009cv00126 |
| March 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| East Baton Rouge |
| James J. Brady |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
RULING Adopting 18 Report and Recommendations, of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Sugar Ray Lewis is DENIED, without prejudice. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 10/8/2009. (NLT, )
|
|
Filing
18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 11 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Sugar Ray Lewis...It is recommended that the pltfs cross motion for summary judgment be denied, without prejudice... Objections to R&R due by 9/3/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 8/20/2009. (JDL, )
|
|
Filing
16
RULING Adopting 12 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The 10 Defts motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the claims against him are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 6/11/2009. (JDL, )
|
|
Filing
12
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Burl Cain...It is recommended that the defts motion to dismiss be granted and the claims against him be dismissed... Objections to R&R due by 6/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 5/26/2009. (JDL, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
