Ezell v. Hooker et al
| Michael Ezell |
| Joseph Hooker, Unknown Herbert, Katy Ard and Unknown Franklin |
| 3:2009cv00180 |
| April 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| East Feliciana |
| Christine Noland |
| John V. Parker |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
RULING Adopting 20 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, plaintiff's claims asserted against defendants Katy Ard and Cadet Franklin are hereby dismissed for failure of plaintiff to serve these defendants within 120 days as mandated by FRCP Rule 4(m). The 19 motion for partial summary judgment by defendants, Joseph Hooker and Gabriel Hebert is granted, dismissing plaintiff's claim asserted against those defendants in their official capacities and dis missing all of plaintiff's remaining claims except his claim that defendants Joseph Hooker and Gabriel Hebert subjected him to excessive force on 11/6/2008. Because plaintiff has failed to come forward with competent evidence to refute defendan ts' assertions relative to the alleged use of force, summary judgment is hereby granted, sua sponte, in favor of defendants Joseph Hooker and Gabriel Hebert on the issue of excessive force, and this action shall be dismissed, with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Ralph E. Tyson on 12/8/2010. (JDL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
