Johnson v. Cain et at
David Scott Johnson |
Burl Cain |
3:2009cv00454 |
July 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
East Baton Rouge |
Christine Noland |
Ralph E. Tyson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 157 RULING and ORDER denying 156 Motion for Relief Pursuant to Rule 60(b) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Request for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 5/12/2014. (SMG) |
Filing 148 RULING: A review of the record shows that the plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee. Therefore, the plaintiffs § 1983 complaint shall be dismissed without prejudice. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 9/6/12. (DCB) |
Filing 141 RULING Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The parties cross-motions for summary judgment (docs. 119and 132) are DENIED, and this matter is referred back to the United StatesMagistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 7/12/2012. (PJH) |
Filing 81 ORDER granting 60 Motion to Stay such that the defendants are hereby directed to respond to the plaintiffs request for production of documents filed in January, 2011, with the additional caveat that the defendants are not required to provide to th e plaintiff a copy of the transcript of his deposition conducted on December 8, 2010 and denying 70 MOTION for Leave to File Second Request for Production of Documents and denying 73 Motion to Compel filed by David Scott Johnson,. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 06/17/11. (PAH). Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 06/17/11. (PAH) |
Filing 39 RULING: Accordingly, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims, and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment 29 is hereby DENIED. Defendants' motions to dismiss and for partial summary judgment 15 & 19 , respectively) are hereby GRANTED insofar as they seek dismissal of the claims asserted against defendants, Burl Cain, Joe Lamartinere, Marcus Callahan, and Troy Poret, with prejudice, and DENIED only insofar as they seek dismiss al of plaintiff's excessive force claim against defendant, Antonio Whitaker in his individual capacity. Plaintiff's motion to stay defendant's motion to dismiss 24 is hereby DENIED as moot, and IT IS ORDERED that this matter is hereby referred back for further proceedings consistent with this ruling. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 9/7/2010. (CMM, ) |
Filing 12 RULING denying 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel and denying 11 Motion for Appointment of Investigative Expert. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 11/18/09. (LSM, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Cain et at | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Scott Johnson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Burl Cain | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.