Hamilton v. Jindal et al
Rodney Hamilton |
Bobby Jindal, James LeBlanc, Jim Wise, Burl Cain, Mary Cockerham and Tessie Cooley |
3:2009cv00847 |
October 6, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
East Baton Rouge |
James J. Brady |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 RULING Adopting 7 Report and Recommendations and 10 Supplemental Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pla's complaint as supplemented and amended, will be dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (e) (2) (B) (i). Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 3/23/10. (BP, ) |
Filing 10 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 9 Amended Complaint filed by Rodney Hamilton...It is recommended that the plaintiff's complaint as supplemented and amended, be dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (e) (2) (B) (i). Objections to R&R due by 3/1/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 2/10/2010. (CMM,) |
Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 1 Complaint filed by Rodney Hamilton...It is recommended that the pltfs complaint be dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)... Objections to R&R due by 1/25/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 1/8/2010. (JDL, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.