Jenkins v. Whittington et al
| George Jenkins |
| Jason Whittington, M. Carlile, Edgar Sherman, Terry Ross, Brad Sterling, Joseph Russell, Lawrence T. Mato, Eric Hinyard, J. Mickey and Unknown Lamartinere |
| 3:2009cv00908 |
| October 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| East Baton Rouge |
| James J. Brady |
| Christine Noland |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
RULING Adopting 16 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. 9 Motion to Dismiss or in the alternative Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part, in that all claims of plaintiff, George Jenkins, except for his claim of excessive force relating to the 1/3/2009 shakedown incident, are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 2/23/10. (BP, )
|
|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 9 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION for Summary Judgment..It is recommended that the motion to dismiss should be granted in part and denied in part, in that all claims of plaintiff, George Jenkins, except for his claim of excessive force relating to the 1/3/2009 shakedown incident, should be dismissed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 2/19/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 2/2/2010. (CMM,)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
