Hood v. Angelle et al
| Carey Louis Hood |
| Samantha Angelle, N. Burl Cain and James LeBlanc |
| 3:2009cv00950 |
| November 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| East Baton Rouge |
| Christine Noland |
| John V. Parker |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER: Pltfs 64 Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART, such that the defts are directed to provide a response to Interrogatory No. 10 of the pltfs Revised Interrogatories within 14 days of the date of this Order, and DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christine Noland on 1/5/2011. (JDL)
|
|
Filing
41
RULING Adopting 37 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. 10 Motion to Dismiss filed by James LeBlanc, N. Burl Cain, Samantha Angelle is denied. 27 Supplemental Motion to Dismiss filed by James LeBlanc, N. Burl Cain, Samantha Angelle is granted, dismissing pla's claims for monetary damages asserted against the dfts in their official capacities, dismissing the pla's claims for injunctive and declaratory relief, and dismissing the pla's claims asserted again st dfts Burl Cain and James LeBlanc in their entirety. This matter is referred back for further proceedings in connection with the pla's claims asserted against dft Samantha Angelle in her individual capacity. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 6/23/10. (BP, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
