Anderson v. D.C.I. Medical Staff et al
| 3:2009cv01057 |
| December 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Docia L Dalby |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
RULING Adopting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Dr. Tarver, 26 Report and Recommendations, of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Defendant's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, DISMISSING the plaintiff's claims for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, with prejudice to his refiling the same claim in forma pauperis.. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 3/3/2011. (PJH)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER: Accordingly, based on the foregoing, the plaintiffs motion, 24 is denied.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Docia L Dalby on 9/30/2010. (CMM, )
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: This proceeding shall be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure of the plaintiff to correct the deficiency of which he was notified. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 3/2/10. (BP, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Anderson v. D.C.I. Medical Staff et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
