Trackling v. Howard
| 3:2010cv00008 |
| January 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Frank J. Polozola |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
OPINION Adopting 4 Report and Recommendations, of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's 1 complaint shall be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1997e (a), and with prejudice to refiling them in forma pauperis status. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 2/17/2010. (CMM,)
|
|
Filing
4
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 1 Complaint filed by Sylvester Trackling. It is the recommendation of the magistrate judge that the pla's complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and with prejudice to refiling them in forma pauperis status. Objections to R&R due by 1/25/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 1/7/10. (BP, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Trackling v. Howard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
