Richardson v. Wilkinson et al
| 3:2010cv00062 |
| January 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Stephen C. Riedlinger |
| Ralph E. Tyson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
RULING AND ORDER adopting the 66 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge as the Court's opinion. Therefore, Petitioner's RULE 60(b) 58 Motion is DENIED. The 69 Motion for Certificate of Appelability is also DENIED because Petitioner failed to " make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Signed by Chief Judge Brian A. Jackson on 3/5/2014. (LLH)
|
|
Filing
39
RULING Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge the petition of Travis Richardson for a writ of habeas corpus isdenied.. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 8/31/2011. (PJH)
|
|
Filing
22
Ruling denying 20 Motion Requesting that a Ruling be Made. The court will address the petitioner's motion to supplement in the magistrate judge's report which will be issued in due course.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 6/2/2010. (CMM, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Richardson v. Wilkinson et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
