Jones v. Caldwell et al

Case Number: 3:2010cv00112
Filed: February 18, 2010
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Referring Judge: Docia L Dalby
Presiding Judge: John V. Parker
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 8, 2010 15 Opinion or Order of the Court RULING Adopting 14 Report and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Dalby dated 10/5/10...defendant's Motion to Dismiss (doc. 17) is hereby granted and this action shall be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and without prejudice to any state law claim.. Signed by Chief Judge Ralph E. Tyson on 12/8/10. (PJH)
October 6, 2010 14 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by John A. Ellis, David E. Verlander, III, Steve Rader, James D. Caldwell, Jr., Kennth Booty. It is recommended that the defendants Motion to Dismiss be granted and this action be dismi ssed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and without prejudice to any state law claim. Objections to R&R due by 10/25/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Docia L Dalby on 10/5/2010. (JDL, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Caldwell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?