Jones v. Caldwell et al
3:2010cv00112 |
February 18, 2010 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Docia L Dalby |
John V. Parker |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 RULING Adopting 14 Report and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge Dalby dated 10/5/10...defendant's Motion to Dismiss (doc. 17) is hereby granted and this action shall be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and without prejudice to any state law claim.. Signed by Chief Judge Ralph E. Tyson on 12/8/10. (PJH) |
Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 9 MOTION to Dismiss filed by John A. Ellis, David E. Verlander, III, Steve Rader, James D. Caldwell, Jr., Kennth Booty. It is recommended that the defendants Motion to Dismiss be granted and this action be dismi ssed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and without prejudice to any state law claim. Objections to R&R due by 10/25/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Docia L Dalby on 10/5/2010. (JDL, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jones v. Caldwell et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.