Baptiste v. Boutte et al

Case Number: 3:2010cv00128
Filed: February 22, 2010
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Referring Judge: Docia L Dalby
Presiding Judge: Frank J. Polozola
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 29, 2011 35 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION Adopting 33 Report and Recommendations... 22 granting Motion for Summary Judgmentfiled by Fredrick Boutte, Reginal Brock... 18 denying Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Alfred John Baptiste of the U.S. Magistrate Judge...Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 09/28/2011. (KDC)
January 13, 2011 26 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The motion to dismiss of pursuant to Rule 12(b) filed on behalf of Assistant Warden Fredrick Boutte and Col. Reginald Brock shall be granted in part, dismissing the plaintiff's ADA claims against Bo utte and Brock in their individual capacities,and in all other respects, the motion to dismiss shall be DENIED. The claims against Sgt. Dillion shall be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P. and this matter shall be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 1/13/11. (PJH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baptiste v. Boutte et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?