Baptiste v. Boutte et al
| 3:2010cv00128 |
| February 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Docia L Dalby |
| Frank J. Polozola |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
OPINION Adopting 33 Report and Recommendations... 22 granting Motion for Summary Judgmentfiled by Fredrick Boutte, Reginal Brock... 18 denying Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Alfred John Baptiste of the U.S. Magistrate Judge...Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 09/28/2011. (KDC)
|
|
Filing
26
OPINION Adopting of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The motion to dismiss of pursuant to Rule 12(b) filed on behalf of Assistant Warden Fredrick Boutte and Col. Reginald Brock shall be granted in part, dismissing the plaintiff's ADA claims against Bo utte and Brock in their individual capacities,and in all other respects, the motion to dismiss shall be DENIED. The claims against Sgt. Dillion shall be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P. and this matter shall be referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 1/13/11. (PJH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baptiste v. Boutte et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
