Babin et al v. Breaux et al

Plaintiff: Ira Paul Babin, II and Thomas G Ray, Jr.
Defendant: Pam Breaux and Scott Hutcheson
Case Number: 3:2010cv00368
Filed: May 26, 2010
Court: Louisiana Middle District Court
Office: Baton Rouge Office
Presiding Judge: John V. Parker
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 11, 2012 41 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 32 Motion to Compel; denying 33 Motion to Compel; granting 38 Joint MOTION for Extension of Discovery Deadlines to Take a 30(b)(6) of the Office of the Governor filed by Ira Paul Babin, II, Thomas G Ray, Jr., MOTION for Lea ve to File Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Deposition of Governor Piyush "Bobby" Jindal filed by Ira Paul Babin, II, Thomas G Ray, Jr., MOTION to Quash Subpoena filed by Bobby Jindal, MOTION to Compel Discovery fro m Governor Bobby Jindal filed by Ira Paul Babin, II, Thomas G Ray, Jr., MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Deposition of Governor Piyush"Bobby" Jindal filed by Ira Paul Babin, II, Thoma s G Ray, Jr., MOTION to Compel Discovery from the Louisiana Governor's Office filed by Ira Paul Babin, II, Thomas G Ray, Jr. ; granting 40 Joint MOTION for Extension of Discovery Deadlines to Take a 30(b)(6) of the Office of the Gove rnor filed by Ira Paul Babin, II, Thomas G Ray, Jr., MOTION for Leave to File Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Deposition of Governor Piyush "Bobby" Jindal filed by Ira Paul Babin, II, Thomas G Ray, Jr., MOTION to Quash < I>Subpoena filed by Bobby Jindal, MOTION to Compel Discovery from Governor Bobby Jindal filed by Ira Paul Babin, II, Thomas G Ray, Jr., MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Deposition of Gov ernor Piyush"Bobby" Jindal filed by Ira Paul Babin, II, Thomas G Ray, Jr., MOTION to Compel Discovery from the Louisiana Governor's Office filed by Ira Paul Babin, II, Thomas G Ray, Jr. ; granting 26 Motion to Quash; denying as moot 30 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines.Signed by Magistrate Judge Docia L Dalby on January 11, 2012. (SR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Babin et al v. Breaux et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ira Paul Babin, II
Represented By: J. Arthur Smith, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas G Ray, Jr.
Represented By: J. Arthur Smith, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pam Breaux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Hutcheson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?