Kearns & Associates Company et al v. Carter et al
Kearns & Associates Company and S&P Specialities Company LLC |
Ricky S. Carter and Ricky Carter & Associates, Inc. |
3:2010cv00439 |
July 2, 2010 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Ralph E. Tyson |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 164 RULING: The Carter Parties' 159 Second Motion to Enforce Stipulated Settlement and Motion to Submit Judgment in Accordance with Stipulated Settlement filed by defendants Ricky S. Carter and Ricky Carter & Associates, Inc., and S & P Specialties Company, LLC, counter-claim plaintiff, is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 1/17/2014. (JDL) |
Filing 111 RULING: Pltfs 80 Motion for Summary Judgment as to the defts Seventh Counterclaim and the defts First and Second Counterclaim and Crossclaims for Tortious Interference with Business Relations, is granted. The remaining aspects of the pltfs motion are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 8/1/2012. (JDL) |
Filing 50 RULING denying 32 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 11/2/2011. (CMM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.