Gipson v. Prince et al
Eric Bernard Gipson |
Unknown Chestnut, Unknown Hall, Johnny Prejean, Howard Prince, Unknown Richardson and Unknown Woods |
3:2010cv00508 |
August 4, 2010 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
Baton Rouge Office |
Frank J. Polozola |
Stephen C. Riedlinger |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 OPINION Adopting 36 Report and Recommendations, of the U.S. Magistrate Judge..IT is Ordered that the pltf's claims against defendants Asst. Warden Hall, Lt. Woods and MSgt. Richardson shall be dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4(m). Judgment shall be entered accordingly.. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 02/09/11. (PAH) |
Filing 30 OPINION: The 9 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Johnny Prejean, Howard Prince, Unknown Chestnut shall be granted and the claims against defts Howard Prince, Carolyn Chestnut and Dr. Johnny Prejean shall be dismissed. Signed by Judge Frank J. Polozola on 12/01/2010. (NLT) |
Filing 29 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding 9 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Dr. Johnny Prejean, Howard Prince, Carolyn Chestnut. It is recommended that the defts motion for summary judgment be granted and the claims against defts Howard Prince, Carolyn Chestnut and Dr. Johnny Prejean be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 11/26/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger on 11/8/2010. (JDL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.