Durbin v. Cain et al
| Ted Durbin |
| Unknown Barrio, K. Benjamin, Burl Cain, Unknown Darbonne, T. Delaney, Unknown Delaughter, B. Dodd, Leslie Dupont, C. Fontenot, R. Jett, J. Lamartinere, Richard Peabody, T. Poret, Unknown Toney, Unknown Turner, Unknown Valant and Darrel Vannoy |
| 3:2010cv00655 |
| October 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| James J. Brady |
| Christine Noland |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
RULING Adopting 67 Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. The defendant's 57 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, the plaintiff's 66 Motion for Leave to Amend Original Complaint is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 9/11/2013. (SMG)
|
|
Filing
50
RULING Adopting 49 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pltfs 41 and 48 Motions for Summary Judgment are DENIED and the 46 Motion for Summary Judgment of defts Burl Cain and Darrell Vannoy is GRANTED IN PART, such that pl tfs claim that deft Darrel Vannoy has refused to allow the pltf to celebrate Jewish religious holiday is DISMISSED, and this matter is referred back for further proceedings in connection with pltfs claim asserted against deft Burl Cain. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 3/8/2012. (JDL)
|
|
Filing
37
SUPPLEMENTAL RULING and ORDER regarding 34 RULING Adopting Report and Recommendation issued on 6/3/2011. Pltf has filed an objection. The court has reviewed pltfs submissions (docs. 33 and 35). The only argument with merit relates to the claims t hat were referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Accordingly, the court simply reinstates its prior ruling approving and adopting the report, with the added notation that pltfs objection lacks merit. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 6/27/2011. (JDL)
|
|
Filing
34
RULING Adopting 32 Report and Recommendations of the U.S. Magistrate Judge as to the 13 Motion to Dismiss. The plaintiff's claims asserted against Msgt. Turner are DISMISSED for failure of the plaintiff to serve this defendant within 120 da ys as mandated by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Further, the defendants' Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 13) is GRANTED IN PART, dismissing the plaintiff's claims asserted against defendants leslie Dupont, Richard Peabody, Ronnie Jett, Bruce Dodd, Tim Delaney, Troy Poret, Joseph lamartinere, Cathy Fontenot, Robert Toney, Brad Delaughter, landry Valant, Randy Barrios, Kevin Benjamin and Chad Darbonne, with prejudice, dismissing the plaintiff's claims asserted agai nst the remaining defendants, Burl Cain and Darrel Vannoy, for monetary damages in the defendants' official capacities, and this action is referred back for further proceedings in connection with the plaintiff's claims that his First Amendm ent right to freely practice his religion and his Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection have been violated by the defendants' refusal to allow him to congregate with members of his faith and refusal to allow him to attend services and g atherings of the Jewish community at the main prison complex (as do members of other religious faiths at LSP), and that prison officials refuse to recognize Jewish holy days or afford inmates an opportunity to congregate, worship or attend services on such days. Signed by Judge James J. Brady on 6/3/2011. (JDL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
