Lambert v. Cain et al
| Jackie Lambert |
| N. Burl Cain, Dept. of Corrections & Public Safety, Charles Lathurn, James M. LeBlanc and R.E. Barrow, Jr. Treatment Center |
| 3:2010cv00777 |
| November 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana |
| Baton Rouge Office |
| Docia L Dalby |
| Brian A. Jackson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
RULING Adopting. Plaintiff's claims asserted against Crystal Moore, Lt, McDowell and Laura Wolf are dismissed for failure of the plaintiff to serve these defendants within 120 days as mandated by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure , The defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (doc, 48) is granted, dismissing plaintiff's claims asserted against the defendants, James LeBlanc, Deptartment of Corrections and Public Safety, RE. Barrow, Jr. Treatment Center, Charles Mather ne, Odis Ratcliff, Tim Delany, Unknown Hooker, Barrett Boeker, Katie Ard, Unknown Blue, Unknown Roundtree, and Glen Ellis, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as mandated by 42 U,S,C, § 1997e, but with prejudice to the refiling of these same claims in forma pauperis. The defendants' pending motions to dismiss (docs. 12, 22 , and 39) are denied as moot, and this action shall be dismissed. Signed by Judge Brian A. Jackson on 8/31/2011. (PJH) Modified on 8/31/2011 (PJH).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
